There are sometimes good reasons to give heirs an unequal inheritance.
Often in estate planning division of assets among heirs is fairly equal. More and more though we are seeing unequal distribution of estates and mostly where there are situations in which parents have good reason.
One example of this would be if you have children from a first marriage and you want to keep assets amassed before your second marriage for those children (and not subsequent heirs). Sometimes there is a child who may have a greater need for money than other children. Because it can be such an emotional situation and cause angst and division in families it’s essential that advisers take the emotion out of situations and rationally and logically help parents to have their desires met in a way that is likely to be held up in court.
[Tweet “If you are thinking of leaving an unequal inheritance, seek legal advice.”]
The wishes of the parents need to be explicitly stated in writing. This way desires are clear and there is no room for interpretation otherwise. Your estate plan can be revised at any stage – they do not have to be set in stone. Circumstances and family relationships can change. Decisions that may have been made when emotions were raw can be revised at a later date to reflect the current state of affairs. A black sheep can sometimes be reconciled to the family.
Communication is Key
People generally don’t like surprises, so communicating your plans to your heirs is an essential part of the estate planning process if you’re hoping for relationships to remain intact down the track. Being open and discussing your decisions and reasoning with family can make the process much more peaceful. Unequal inheritance of an estate doesn’t have to be unpleasant. Estate litigation is less likely when there is no big surprise.
In the case of one family, two daughters are being treated differently to account for the learning disabilities of one and the successful career of another. Both daughters met with the parents where the rationale for their decision was explained. The self-sufficient daughter (who will receive less) was given the opportunity to appreciate the decision and was persuaded by the idea. What may have become a divisive issue is avoided with open communication and understanding.
Sometimes parents play favourites and this might be to reward one child for something or to punish another. Giving your children an unequal inheritance can be a bit like playing with fire, but there are ways that the fire can be kept under control so that it doesn’t become a raging inferno.
Creating incentives is one reason parents proceed this way. Sometimes a family may have a child who is abusing drugs or alcohol and there may be a trustee that is prohibited from giving the child money until they are sober. So it may not be that they are allocated less money, but have a gatekeeper to help them use it wisely.
[Tweet “Sometimes an unequal inheritance is the best for every beneficiary of the will.”]
There may be a child who has ongoing physical or psychological issues, so parents may leave more money for their care. Patricia Maisano whose firm often advises in cases such as this said that she had one case where one of the sons suffered a severe head injury in a car accident as an adult, rendering him unable to care for himself. Prior to the accident, he was a biochemist. After the injury, his parents switched their estate around so the bulk of the estate would go toward his care after they were gone. The man’s brother didn’t mind he was getting less, because he could see how much care his brother needed.
In situations like this, an unequal inheritance is necessary.
A level playing field is often desired by parents for all their children and so they may give more money to one child to create this. It may be that one child has a lucrative business that makes them millions of dollars and another child does not work and is married to a school teacher. Mickey Segal, who is a partner of a business management firm says that when he does see it happen that “in most cases, I have found that where you see a huge disparity in distribution—usually with the much bigger estates—that even with the disparity, everyone gets enough to be OK.”
But not always. Even though parents may feel that they’re trying to be fair, there is often someone who feels like they’re getting more harshly treated.
While parents can decide to do whatever they want, experts recommend against leaving one child nothing at all. Children have the right under the law to make a claim against the estate if they receive an unequal inheritance that they feel is unfair.
Reasons Why Parents Distribute An Unequal Inheritance
When it comes to estate planning, its a time when parents think hard about each child’s needs and what has been done for them already. Real life is not always a happy story and so our wills may reflect this. Although for many families treating all children equally is the better choice, it’s not always prudent in the circumstances and your estate plan will need to take that into account. Here are some reasons an unequal inheritance is the wisest choice:
- One child is disabled or has a chronic disease – so a trust may be created to help them financially for the remainder of their lives
- One child is much more wealthy than another – for whatever reason they are so disparate in wealth it’s good to communicate with both children whether before your death or in your will so that they have an understanding. Some children equate wealth with love and giving them more or less without an explanation can lead to misunderstanding.
- One child has several marriages end in divorce – you may want to leave this child’s inheritance in trust.
- One child is miserable at managing money – they may gamble or be unable to control their spending. Setting up a trust or specifying what money you leave to them can be used for may help protect them from themselves.
- One child has borrowed money for a house, college or to get out of debt – treat it as an early inheritance and take this into account with your estate planning.
- One child is estranged from the family – there is no law against disinheriting a child, but it’s better to make that clear in your will instead of just not mentioning them.
Estate planning can be tricky if you try and do it by yourself, but by seeking the counsel of professionals you ensure that your wishes are clear and can be followed. For a free, 10-minute phone consultation with one of our estate lawyers, please contact us today!
I agree with you that communication is key in these instances. I think along with giving heirs a fair understanding of what they should expect, it can also give them time to make changes that may qualify them for a larger inheritance. If you are giving one child less because of their poor choices, letting them know in advance could give them the opportunity to show you that they can straighten out their life. Communication is also nice because it lets them know how to be better financially prepared and what extra income they can expect in their life. Thanks for all this great information!
Thank you for visiting, April! You are right about communication – good communication always helps.
This has helped me a lot, although I still have a question, my fathers will is equal between me and my sister, I am pregnant but this is not mentioned in the will, would I be entitled to more?
Thanks for your question Becky. We’ll be in touch with you shortly to answer your question.
Thanks for the interesting article. If my parents have given my brother money for a deposit on a house and are calling it an investment rather than an early inheritance how does that affect distribution in the will if they want us to both inherit equally. If they were calling it an early inheritance we would just have unequal distribution and we would both come out at the end getting equal money in essence but they are calling this house he has bought with part of their money as an investment. Thanks
Thanks for your question, Taryn. We will be in contact with you to answer your questions.
I am one of three siblings, who was severely abused as a child and now have PTSD.
My parents have just told me of their intention to leave all the house to one of my siblings who had frittered away his income (he earns more than me) as he is “broke” and had two failed relationships and never bought a house as they feel if they didn’t he will ever have a house.
They put a huge amount of pressure on me to do the same as my other brother and give up any claim to an inheritance as they intended I will receive nothing.
Stunned I objected that the money would eventually would all go to my brothers offspring that it would ufair to my son, so now they have left my son 1/5.
I am really angry that after all the abuse I suffered that I will receive nothing to cover the harm caused or the medical bills. Do I have the right to claim?
Thank you for visiting – our office will be in touch with you soon.